The Deniable Truth: Moms Have Sex Too

Blog Category: HIV prevention, sex education — Blogged by: Emily on May 15, 2007 at 8:00 am

Was anybody else bombarded with email alerting us to the uncomfortable truth that our mothers are having sex and our daughters will someday soon? If nothing else, my inbox last week reminded me of what many people work to deny - that our mothers are sexual beings. Take that one logical step further and we see why HIV preventionists and reproductive rights advocates are taking this opportunity to talk about sexual health and safety.

In case your inbox was neglected: Planned Parenthood reminded us to “Protect Her Future. Protect Her Health.” by (HPV) vaccinating our daughters. The Global Campaign for Microbicides didn’t miss a beat in taking Mother’s Day as an occasion to remind our legislators that mothers, and all women, around the world need new prevention methods like microbicides to protect themselves, their partners, their children, and future generations.

Though it was a couple degrees of separation to get there, I commend these groups for creatively drawing attention to that fact that mothers and daughters are also women who have sex – and are thus vulnerable to HIV and HPV - and that they deserve access to current and future technologies that give them the power to keep themselves healthy.

Let others know about this postThese icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

2 Comments »

Comment by Aunt Loie

May 30, 2007 @ 2:14 pm

And kudos to you for recognizing these contributions and dedicating so much of your time and energy to making a difference.

Comment by dsaklad@gnu.org

June 8, 2007 @ 9:32 am

One of the overlooked areas of prevention is a thought experiment… the strategy of let’s get tested TOGETHER BEFORE we have sex for A VARIETY of sexually transmitted diseases. Here’s an example of an exchange from a discussion of the thought experiment.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Is that false sense of security the same as the false sense
of security that hemophiliacs have about blood transfusions?
Or anyone who needs a transfusion?

Is it comparable to the false sense of security that a TB
test gives parents when they send their kids to a public
school?

Is it anything like the false sense of security one gets from
wearing a seatbelt while riding in a car?

No wonder people everywhere are all jittery. We are all
surrounded by false senses of security!

Help! Somebody is going to get fuming mad at my
response and I’m going to suffer a false sense of
security for another 60+ years waiting for that person
to die of old age–or become too infirm to make me
feel insecure! HELP!!

| But as I’ve pointed out repeatedly, this only works *** IF *** the
| potential sex partners abstained from sex with anyone from the
| moment of testing to receiving the test results to the time they
| reach the bedroom.
| For certain high-risk groups, the probability of all this occurring
| is almost nil, and you would also have to include several weeks of
| abstinence before the test, as the test can’t detect the virus
| until several weeks after infection. This would work if the
| potential partners were physically confined on a desert island or
| in a prison camp or somewhere, but since that isn’t going to happen
| this idea is just a waste of time and money and actually makes
| things worse by provding the testees with a false sense of security.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>