Attention Presidential Candidates: the Call for a National AIDS Strategy.

Blog Category: action, policy, women — Blogged by: AIDS Action on September 18, 2007 at 3:35 pm

Joe Sudbay over at AMERICAblog has a post today talking about the need for a focused plan to end the AIDS epidemic, and the National AIDS Strategy that’s trying to make that a reality.

We’re all hearing a lot about the 2008 presidential race already, and the National AIDS Strategy is working to focus the candidates on the need to seriously address the problem here at home. It’s called for every candidate to develop a results-oriented strategy to fight HIV/AIDS domestically.

On the table is not only the fact that an estimated half of the million-plus Americans living with HIV/AIDS are not in care, but the huge disparities in who’s affected by the disease: the disproportionately high impact the epidemic is having on people of color, women of color (as the site points out, in 2004, HIV/AIDS was the leading cause of death among black women ages 25 - 34; for more on the impact of HIV on all women, see this post), gay men and other groups that can easily be made invisible in politics.

AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts and hundreds of organizations and individuals have already signed on to send the message to the candidates that this should be a priority. Hopefully they’ll listen. We urge our supporters to sign on and to ask other organizations and your friends and family to sign as well.

Find out more at www.nationalaidsstrategy.org.

26 Years In – It’s About Time to Recognize HIV’s Impact on Women

Blog Category: advocacy, policy, women — Blogged by: Heidi on March 9, 2007 at 8:27 am

This Saturday, March 10th is the Second Annual National Women and Girls HIV/AIDS Awareness Day. Last year was the first year set aside as a national observation day to raise awareness of the increasing impact of HIV/AIDS on the lives of women and girls.

To that end, this year’s theme is “Taking Action to Save Our Lives”

Is it about time? – Well, today:

IS IT ABOUT TIME?
“taking action to save lives”? Why not two decades ago? That may have made a big difference today if treatment options and services for women were addressed earlier on. The call to raise awareness now? – Is that because people are finally getting it that women are getting “it”. Or maybe, because so many women are dying – hence the call to take action to “save lives”. The real bottom line is that women historically get overlooked. Whatever happened to “save the women and children first”? I guess not when it comes to HIV infection.

One thought, is that 78% of HIV positive women have contracted HIV through heterosexual sex or “presumed heterosexual sex” yet, “presumed heterosexual” is not an “identified risk” factor – so many women don’t fit nicely into one of the “high risk” categories (i.e., MSM or IDUs that gets “counted” and more importantly, funded). Maybe because most women don’t have an “identified risk” is why there has been so little, for example, research on what the effect of sex/gender and body weight has on antiretroviral medications or a real effort to develop gender specific programs and resources across the nation for women. Instead, women have to fit into treatment protocols and medication doses determined for men – but this isn’t a new idea. Not that long ago, the largest treatment study for breast cancer was conducted on men only. Did having male subjects for this study delay women’s breast cancer treatment that is now available for women – I’m not sure – but likely.

Women are not an emerging at risk population – they are here and have been HIV positive for decades - the 2007 awareness campaign to “take action and save lives” – well, now in the 26th year – IT IS ABOUT TIME! Don’t you think?